Founders' Agreements in the UAE: What Startup Founders Need to Know

Eighteen months in, your co-founder accepts a corporate job and stops showing up. He wrote half the codebase, he owns a third of the company, and nothing in writing says he has to give any of it back. Your next investor will open the cap table, find his name against 33% of the shares, and ask why a third of the business belongs to someone who no longer answers emails.

This scenario is not rare. Harvard Business School professor Noam Wasserman, who studied roughly 10,000 founders for his book The Founder's Dilemmas, found that 65% of high-potential startups fail because of conflict among co-founders. The breakups also come early: Carta data tracking over 22,000 founders in two- and three-person teams found that around 23% of co-founders have left their company by year three, and more than 30% by year five.

A founders' agreement exists for exactly this moment. This guide covers what the agreement is, how it differs from the documents founders confuse it with, the clauses that do the real work, and why your choice of UAE jurisdiction decides whether any of it is actually enforceable

What is a Founders' Agreement?

A founders' agreement is a private contract between the founders of a company, and usually the company itself as a party, that regulates how the founders hold their shares, govern the business, and part ways if one of them leaves. A typical agreement covers:

• How each founder's equity vests over time
• What happens to a founder's shares when they leave
• Restrictions on selling or transferring shares
• Which decisions require every founder's consent (raising capital, issuing shares, changing founder remuneration, selling the company)
• Each founder's role and time commitment
• Confirmation that all intellectual property belongs to the company, not to any individual founder

The right time to sign one is before the first external cheque, ideally at incorporation. Once money, valuations, and leverage enter the picture, the conversation about who deserves what becomes far harder to have.

Founders' Agreement vs. Shareholders' Agreement vs. Articles of Association

Founders often hear these three terms used loosely. They are different documents with different jobs, and they arrive at different stages of the company's life.

The practical takeaway: the founders' agreement is the pre-investment document, made by founders for founders. When the first priced round closes, investors will typically require a shareholders' agreement covering everyone on the cap table, and that document usually supersedes the founders' agreement. Until then, the founders' agreement and the articles must agree with each other: a well-drafted founders' agreement obliges the shareholders to amend the articles whenever the two conflict.

Vesting: The Clause That Does the Heavy Lifting

How reverse vesting works

Founder vesting in a founders' agreement usually works in reverse: each founder holds their full shareholding from day one, but the shares are split into vested and unvested portions. Unvested shares vest in monthly instalments over the vesting period, typically 48 months. If the founder leaves before the schedule completes, the company can buy back whatever has not yet vested, usually at cost.

Four-year vesting with a one-year cliff is the structure investors expect to see on founder equity. Carta's analysis of co-founder departures shows why it matters: departures accelerate most in the 2.5 to 4 year window, squarely inside a standard vesting period.

The cliff

If a founder leaves during the initial cliff period (commonly the first 12 months), all of their unvested shares can be bought back. A founder who walks in month ten keeps nothing, with a carve-out usually made for death or permanent incapacity.

Three founders split equity equally with 48-month vesting and a 12-month cliff. One leaves at month 10: the company can repurchase all of their shares at cost. One leaves at month 24: half their shares have vested and are theirs to keep, and the unvested half goes back at cost. The remaining founders are protected without a single negotiation.

Acceleration on an exit

Well-drafted agreements also deal with acceleration. A common approach: if the company is sold and a founder is pushed out (other than for cause) within 12 months of completion, their unvested shares vest in full. That stops an acquirer from terminating founders purely to claw back their equity.

Median valuation caps on post-money SAFEs in Q3 2025: $10M for rounds under $1M raised, $15M for rounds between $1M and $2.5M raised (Carta data).

Good Leaver, Bad Leaver: The Labels That Set the Price

When a founder leaves, two questions decide everything: which shares can be taken back, and at what price. The good leaver / bad leaver mechanism answers both.

Good leaver: a founder who leaves on clean terms, such as death, incapacity, mutual agreement, or simply moving on after the lock-in. A good leaver typically keeps their vested shares and gives back only the unvested ones at cost.

Bad leaver: a founder who commits fraud or gross misconduct, materially breaches their restrictive covenants, or resigns during an agreed lock-in period. A bad leaver can lose not only their unvested shares at cost, but also some or all of their vested shares at a discount to fair value, for example 75% of fair price.

How the buyback works

The buyback usually operates as a company option, exercisable within a fixed window after the leaving date (60 business days, for instance), with the price anchored either to the most recent funding round or to a good-faith board valuation. If the leaver refuses to sign the transfer forms, the agreement authorises a director to execute them on the leaver's behalf as their attorney. That mechanism works cleanly in some UAE jurisdictions and poorly in others, as discussed below.

The bad leaver definition is the most-litigated part of any founders' agreement. Pin down who decides whether conduct crosses the line (usually the board, acting in good faith), build in a cure period for breaches that can be remedied, and let the remaining founders agree in writing to treat a technical bad leaver as a good leaver when circumstances warrant it.

Share Transfers: Keeping Strangers Off the Cap Table

Vesting controls what happens when a founder leaves. Transfer restrictions control what happens while everyone stays: whether a founder can sell shares to an outsider you have never met. The standard architecture has three parts:

• Baseline restriction: no transfers without unanimous board approval, at least until the vesting period has run.
• Permitted transfers: founders can usually move vested shares to other founders, family members, or wholly-owned vehicles, but only if the recipient signs a deed of adherence binding them to the same agreement.
• Pre-emption rights: before selling to a third party, a founder must offer the shares to the other founders first, pro rata. Before the company issues new shares, existing founders get first refusal in proportion to their holdings.

One detail worth noting: pre-emption rights typically lapse for a founder who becomes a leaver, so a departed founder cannot block or piggyback on future rounds.

Where You Incorporate Decides Whether Any of This Works

Everything above is contract drafting. Whether the contract performs as written depends on where your company lives.

ADGM and DIFC: built for this

Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) and Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) are independent common-law jurisdictions within the UAE, applying English common law through their own courts. For founders' agreements, that matters in three concrete ways:

• Enforceable mechanics: compulsory transfer provisions, board-determined leaver classifications, and power-of-attorney execution clauses are familiar common-law constructs, enforced as ordinary commercial contract terms.
• Flexible share capital: both jurisdictions allow the articles to be tailored so the constitutional documents mirror the founders' agreement.
• Clean execution: share transfers are effected through company instruments and registry filings in English, so a leaver buyback can complete without a notary and without the leaver's cooperation.

Mainland UAE: the mechanics fight you

Can mainland founders sign a founders' agreement? Yes, and the commitments in it are real contractual obligations. The problem is execution. In a mainland LLC, a share transfer is only effective through a notarised transfer deed (in Arabic) and an update to the commercial register. The Commercial Companies Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 32 of 2021) also gives existing partners statutory pre-emption rights when shares are sold to an outsider, which the parties cannot simply contract away.

Now replay the leaver scenario on the mainland: your bad leaver refuses to appear before the notary. The self-executing buyback you drafted now depends on persuading a mainland court to compel a share transfer through a notarisation process the leaver is boycotting, applying concepts the system was not designed around. You may win eventually. Your fundraise will not wait for the judgment.

If you intend to raise venture capital, incorporate your holding company in ADGM or DIFC and sign the founders' agreement at the same time. The agreement, the articles, the IP assignments, and the restrictive covenant deeds should land as one package. Founders' agreements for ADGM and DIFC companies are commonly governed by English law with arbitration as the dispute forum, which keeps disputes in front of decision-makers who deal with these instruments routinely.
A founders' agreement is the cheapest insurance a startup will ever buy. It costs a few uncomfortable conversations at a moment when everyone still likes each other, and it converts the single most common startup failure mode into a process with a known outcome.

DISCLOSURE: This article is solely for educational purposes and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon as, tax, legal, accounting, or investment advice. The information provided does not take into account your specific circumstances, and you are strongly advised to consult with your own professional advisors before making any decisions or taking any action. Seed and Scale does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein.

Free Guide

Launching in the UAE? Start smart

The UAE is a fast-growing hub for startups, but getting the setup right matters.
Download our practical guide to the key legal steps, common pitfalls and early decisions founders should understand before launching